Home › Forums › Learning Design Groups › Behaviour change communication for the knowledge worker › Analysis of activity profile
Tagged: Activity 5
- This topic has 15 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by
sshongwe.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Thula
saidHere we consider the balance of activity types to include in our course/module
jolandamorkel
saidThula, have you taken this activity into another online space? Feel free to ask if you need any advice on how to proceed.
Thula
saidHi Jolanda, thanks for prodding. We are now getting started with Activity 5. Both team mates, SS and PB have advised about how we wish to organise our course. May we take our cue from the attached document which maps our Course -at a glance. It includes our agreed upon leaner profile, course outcomes and preferred pedagogical approach.
I have also attached our Activity 5 Template, in which we are to: 1. Predict our course pedagogical profile presentation and 2. Predict course/module hours. Does this represent a fair distribution of notional hours per category of activity?Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.Jolanda
saidHi Thula, it’s a very good idea to map your course to provide an overall picture at one glance. In this way you can better recognize the links and relationships in the learning design.
Jolanda
saidThula, you will notice that the Activity Profile changes according to the values inserted, so you can play around with it and test it until you are satisfied with the picture.
Thula
saidHi Jolanda, indeed the template for the Activity Profile is a great planning tool. The other day Dr SS and I commented on how we will benefit from such tools as we plan to facilitate a similar workshop during the week of 23-28 June, 2014. Thanks for your earlier comment too, Jolanda on providing a picture of our course at a glance. I have now attached to this post a Work in Progress Draft of our Course at a Glance. Team mates, does this picture depict all that we have agreed upon since activities 1 to 4?
-
This reply was modified 8 years, 10 months ago by
Thula.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.pbiswalo
saidHello Thula and SS, Good work on the Predicted Pedagogy profile representation. The categories used do address the process/outcomes. I was most interested to see if practical activities are covered. I think they are well covered.
pbiswalo
saidThe BCC course at a glance is taking shape. Good idea for the adaptation. Maybe we populate the planned course sessions based on the units we have suggested. Good work Thula.
Thula
saidThanks PB for your feedback- in which you rightly indicate that we now need to begin to combine the outputs of all the completed activities. The picture is now becoming clearer. See the attached collated document of our Course-at-a-Glance. SS has given us the go-ahead to proceed to our Storyboard
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.sshongwe
saidWell done Team. Checking back at our activity 3 and 5 I am satisfied that this is what we want as expressed in our course at a glance. I was looking for ‘assessment’. Are we saying it will be embedded in the activities or we want it as a stand alone?
Thula
saidHi SS, you are the expert at making a distinction between assessment tasks and activities. Team, please see link to our work in progress Storyboard (not sure if it is accessible): http://linoit.com/users/Thula/canvases/inbox
-
This reply was modified 8 years, 10 months ago by
Thula.
Thula
saidDear Team
Try this other link: http://linoit.com/groups/BCC%20Storyboard/canvases/BCC%20Storyboard.Jolanda
saidThula, the storyboard is clear. Have you though about how performance would be assessed. e.g. group discussions? What kinds of assessible outputs will be generated, or would it not be relevant for this course?
Thula
saidHi Jolanda, thanks for good question.
Our first task was to develop a storyboard in which the learning outcomes are aligned with the assessment events, topics (contents) and e-tivities. We referred to Biggs’ (1999) argument that there is need for constructive alignment in the choice of learning outcomes, the teaching method and assessment task. To come up with our assessment rubric, we are guided by the level of understanding required as stated in our learning outcome. As a result, our assessment task will test whether the students have acquired the outcome. For example- The outcome for Assessment Event 1: Expose to new concepts, change theories towards a socio-ecological model and facts. We also made use of Conole et al’s (2004) mini learning activities to come up with the e-tivities. Team: How helpful is a generic discussion rubric like the one attached to this post?Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files. -
This reply was modified 8 years, 10 months ago by
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.